Back in the early 80s I felt moved to buy a book simply entitled 'Emotions'. I haven't spotted it for many years but I think it is still on a book shelf somewhere. Thinking back, I must have been trying to understand my emotional states from a young age.
I do remember in that era feeling my emotions very intensely - love, anger, frustration, happiness. I remember one lunchtime standing at a pedestrian crossing and looking up the hill of Collins Street and feeling a burst of light-headed happiness at simply being alive in that moment, in that spot, on Earth. There was no particular reason for the onset of that emotion. It simply came over me.
I also remember, in that same era, being very disappointed one day by someone's behaviour. I remember going outside in my little garden and sitting on a chair and not moving at all for an hour; just trying, by way of complete stillness, to overcome my deep feelings of discombobulation and despair.
I have made a study of these emotional states, mainly because I aim not to feel life so intensely. I am not trying to mitigate the positive emotions; the swell in my chest when the sun finally made an appearance this morning after weeks of grey sky and rain, or the delight I experienced when on my walk yesterday I came upon a group of young children making a film.
However, I really could do without the derailing emotional moments when I might feel, that if only some people could behave a little more like I wished they would behave, life would be so much better. I hope you smiled when you read that last sentence because I do understand how silly that sounds. But, it would, wouldn't it, be so lovely if people didn't disappoint us?! I've struggled with this so, of wishing for change that isn't likely to come.
I did a meditation with a group last night and in the group was a young man I know who has a touch of Aspbergers. I am not sure if this is typical of the condition but he was saying that he came in for a session with a healer type of person when he realized that the mayhem he had caused in a group of friends didn't trouble him. He realized that the fact that he wasn't troubled by what he had done, didn't feel guilty, wasn't right, and so he chose to do something about it. I think that is quite an evolved state. So many other people would choose denial, or defence, against their behaviour.
It's frustrating to me to feel that sometimes I am speaking another language; that my choice of words are not really going to make a difference to the outcome. I'm just not going to get through to some people. I struggle with the fact that they are not going to change. At all.
Years ago, going through a dilemma, I remember saying, 'Just tell me when it will end. If you can give me a finishing date then I can work towards that.' I meant that I wanted an idea as to how long I needed to hold on. The thought of being in turmoil endlessly was too much, so just tell me how long I need to be brave, and then I can measure it, control it, contain it; make do.
As time has gone by I have come to realize that some things don't actually change because it doesn't occur to people that they need to change. 'Oh, that's Mary' someone will say. Or, 'Jack is always late'. Or, 'Sally always put herself first'. Or, 'Meg would do anything for you. She's always been like that.' If you wait for someone to change to suit your specifications, you'll be waiting a long time.
I sat and contemplated my frustration for a time yesterday. I could feel the frustration sitting in my chest; bubbles of upset that refused to scatter. It became apparent over the day that being still wouldn't help me so I called the dog and off we went for a long walk. It's my own expectations and hope for change that causes me such grief. It's a sense of 'acceptance' that brings me peace; acknowledging the constancy of behaviours.
I understand that communication is considered the key to people coming to a mutually acceptable outcome, but what if only one person requires change; if the only mutually acceptable outcome is that there is no change. Isn't it then official that one person is left to sit terminally with their dissatisfaction? Does the offical status make it better?
Looking for answers, I read that when frustrated it is a sign that the way you are doing something doesn't work, and that this tells you that you need to make a change in the way you are going about it. This makes sense but it doesn't speak to the notion that to expect some people to change is to bang one's head against a brick wall, no matter which strategy you use. They have to want to change themselves, not you wanting them to change. What are the chances?
So, I think the change has to come from within. Accept that some things and some people don't change. Minimize the damage to your mind. It is what it is. That feels so much better.
I do remember in that era feeling my emotions very intensely - love, anger, frustration, happiness. I remember one lunchtime standing at a pedestrian crossing and looking up the hill of Collins Street and feeling a burst of light-headed happiness at simply being alive in that moment, in that spot, on Earth. There was no particular reason for the onset of that emotion. It simply came over me.
I also remember, in that same era, being very disappointed one day by someone's behaviour. I remember going outside in my little garden and sitting on a chair and not moving at all for an hour; just trying, by way of complete stillness, to overcome my deep feelings of discombobulation and despair.
I have made a study of these emotional states, mainly because I aim not to feel life so intensely. I am not trying to mitigate the positive emotions; the swell in my chest when the sun finally made an appearance this morning after weeks of grey sky and rain, or the delight I experienced when on my walk yesterday I came upon a group of young children making a film.
However, I really could do without the derailing emotional moments when I might feel, that if only some people could behave a little more like I wished they would behave, life would be so much better. I hope you smiled when you read that last sentence because I do understand how silly that sounds. But, it would, wouldn't it, be so lovely if people didn't disappoint us?! I've struggled with this so, of wishing for change that isn't likely to come.
I did a meditation with a group last night and in the group was a young man I know who has a touch of Aspbergers. I am not sure if this is typical of the condition but he was saying that he came in for a session with a healer type of person when he realized that the mayhem he had caused in a group of friends didn't trouble him. He realized that the fact that he wasn't troubled by what he had done, didn't feel guilty, wasn't right, and so he chose to do something about it. I think that is quite an evolved state. So many other people would choose denial, or defence, against their behaviour.
It's frustrating to me to feel that sometimes I am speaking another language; that my choice of words are not really going to make a difference to the outcome. I'm just not going to get through to some people. I struggle with the fact that they are not going to change. At all.
Years ago, going through a dilemma, I remember saying, 'Just tell me when it will end. If you can give me a finishing date then I can work towards that.' I meant that I wanted an idea as to how long I needed to hold on. The thought of being in turmoil endlessly was too much, so just tell me how long I need to be brave, and then I can measure it, control it, contain it; make do.
As time has gone by I have come to realize that some things don't actually change because it doesn't occur to people that they need to change. 'Oh, that's Mary' someone will say. Or, 'Jack is always late'. Or, 'Sally always put herself first'. Or, 'Meg would do anything for you. She's always been like that.' If you wait for someone to change to suit your specifications, you'll be waiting a long time.
I sat and contemplated my frustration for a time yesterday. I could feel the frustration sitting in my chest; bubbles of upset that refused to scatter. It became apparent over the day that being still wouldn't help me so I called the dog and off we went for a long walk. It's my own expectations and hope for change that causes me such grief. It's a sense of 'acceptance' that brings me peace; acknowledging the constancy of behaviours.
I understand that communication is considered the key to people coming to a mutually acceptable outcome, but what if only one person requires change; if the only mutually acceptable outcome is that there is no change. Isn't it then official that one person is left to sit terminally with their dissatisfaction? Does the offical status make it better?
Looking for answers, I read that when frustrated it is a sign that the way you are doing something doesn't work, and that this tells you that you need to make a change in the way you are going about it. This makes sense but it doesn't speak to the notion that to expect some people to change is to bang one's head against a brick wall, no matter which strategy you use. They have to want to change themselves, not you wanting them to change. What are the chances?
So, I think the change has to come from within. Accept that some things and some people don't change. Minimize the damage to your mind. It is what it is. That feels so much better.
Three sayings/quotations come to mind
ReplyDelete1. "Would that God the gift would gie us to see ourselves as others see us"
2. "When I was 18 my Dad was pretty stupid but since I turned 21 I was amazed by how much he had learned"
3 on a note by James Mossman - a BBC journalist - before he committed suicide " I just want it to end , although I don't know what "it" is"
I hope all of that doesn't sound too patronising.
Stephen: Thank you for your comment. I have read a little of your blog and I am sure the last few years have been very difficult for you. It must surely have been sad for you losing your wife in that way. I am sorry.
ReplyDeleteIn writing the above post I was most aware that I was leaving myself out of the equation, almost as if *I* was excempt from not causing frustration to others, which I am pretty sure is not the case. But, in doing that, talking as if I am in the privileged position, it underscores the point you make in point 1, I think, that we rarely do have the capacity to see ourselves as others see us. Perhaps the more one delves inwards, the more one does get to see all angles. I have certainly imagined how others have seen me. I did a yoga class in a new location with new people last week and I could see some of the women sizing me up and sort of categorizing me and it made me smile. It's just what we do, isn't it, most unfairly.
Point 2. I love this about life, that people surprise us, that relationships are subject to change. My youngest son and I shared a rissotto and a glass of wine last night on the couch, watched 'Inside Out' (his choice) and then my choice 'Le Weekend' (again). I'm struck in that movie at those subtle moments of change of sentiment between the couple. It's lovely to be surprised, even after decades together, and those soft moments when love floods the heart all over again. We think 'right' is all on our side, but of course, it is never the case. It's lovely to see with fresh eyes.
Point 3. My goodness, James Mossman could not have written a sadder note, could he? I came across 'So Sad Today' on Twitter, a young American woman who tweeted her saddest and darkest thoughts anonymously into the ether only to find an audience of hundreds of thousands of people who connected with her. It's no bad thing to realize that our darkest thoughts are not ours alone. I think the statement he made bothers me most because I sometimes refer to myself as 'it', when I've lost my 'I' and just happily exist as a non-thinking entity. 'It' is a happy space for me.
Connecting with others in all our humanness on this journey through life is what makes 'it' matter and I am glad you reached out. Thank you for that.
I seldom post on Blogs (who do I think I am anyway - lol)
ReplyDeleteWhen I was a little boy there was an old man who used to deliver newspapers which he carried in what was called a "piler" (a wooden box on wheels)
I used to meet him at weekends when he would take a break to have a thermos of tea.
I thought he was wonderful and knew all the answers and I knew that when I grew up I wanted to be like him.
Well now I'm the old man (without the paper round )
and I know that I don't even know what the question is - never mind the answer
Ive noticed that many of the Bogs you subscribe to are what used to be called "New Age" people with catch phrases / insights/wise aphorisms/paths to enlightenment.
Will Self -a British broadcaster and cynic ran a late night radio spot on which he asked members of the public "what is the meaning of life"
At the end of the week he revealed that he thought it was a stupid question and that what he should have asked was "why are we here" because , if nothing else , he thought it was the central question.
At my age and without a paper round I like Blaise Pascal ,who said something like "Believe in God because if you are wrong and there is no God - then you've lost nothing at the end of life. But if you are right - what joy"
So throwing out all of that transcendental rhubarb and imitation peace, love and a magic mushroom please
I am a simple soul and I go with Will Self and Blaise Pascal. Why are we here and is there a God. Same question ,same answer. If there is a God then we know why we are here.
And I don't differentiate between Christian/Jewish/Muslim/Hindu etc. There is only One ,call him/her what you will.
Gosh I thought I was going to post something short and sweet
Stephen: I suppose I'm working my way towards being "old" too. When I was young I don't recall asking the question 'why are we here?' but it is a question that goes through my mind now.
ReplyDeleteI think about the fact that I was born without memory of that moment of entry to the world, of what went before, and one day I'll exit in much the same way; like the moment between wake and sleep.
I've read a lot of fiction in my life and it's amazing how much you can boil most stories down to an exploration of love; the need for it, the joy of it, the lack of it; the damage done when people are angry, in fear; when they are in conflict.
I think we are here to learn how to be human and what really matters. I think all connections with other people matter; recognizing how similar we are; that we all carry the need and desire for love; that we will all experience pain.
There are spiritual people/leaders that inspire me - Pema Chodron, Eckhart Tolle; even the Lazi Yogi in my reading list, a young man in his 20s, much wiser than his years who is now a Medical Student in NYC with so much to give those who come into contact with him.
Lately, I've started to feel some fear in how close violence is coming to my door; the stealing of items in the street; a woman randomly attacked and knifed by a man with 2 accomplices with their own unknown agenda. It is thought that 5% of young men are in trouble by the age of 3 and that the situation requires intervention unless they carry their troubled minds into a future potentially causing havoc in their paths. Issues starts very early and fester. I believe the money needs to go into the pre-school age of life.
I believe in family, love, education, intervention at a young age if required, kindness, connection. I think we're all here because we are and the reason why we are here is unknown. The meaning of life is to understand that we are all here together, much the same, and that we should do what we can when we can for those on this path with us. Each and every smile, random act of kindness, expression of love IS the meaning of life.
Have a wonderful day.