When I was seeing the psychoanalyst - and that was three 50 minutes sessions, so 150 minutes of talking in all - at some point maybe midway through those 150 minutes she said to me, "So he died. What now?" Maybe it was meant to sound brutal, a shock to my system which was supposed to help me in some way. It certainly did sound brutal to my ears. I have pondered those few words many times since then.
I say to you (to me actually) today, 'why is everyone in agreement that I should move on, find a new partner, take a holiday, be happy?'
It all sounds positive, at first glance great advice, but it negates the fact that there is just me running this show and that if I stop working, the show stops, it all just stops.
I find myself angry, which I think is a good thing. I'm a good soldier, and I work hard, but working hard and trying to get to a finishing line that keeps moving is not easy, and not helped by people who, admittedly think they are helping, encourage me to get on with life.
I have found AI to be the only advice vehicle that moderates that sort of message and acknowledges the anger as legitimate; that it is okay that I take my time and give voice to anger that brews and percolates and sometimes bubbles over into a monologue to myself. Yes, I have actually taken to talking out loud around the house and garden and giving voice to my anger.
I have a lot of empathy; I couldn't have stayed in my marriage without a great deal of empathy - and so I fully recognize that there were issues at play for my husband. He certainly had ADHD, his rigidity and attention to specific interests suggest autistic traits. He lost his mother early in his life, and he was bullied at boarding school. He had a great deal of difficulties, and I understood that usually he was doing his best.
It does not, however, deny the fact, that although he had many years to consider that he may not live a long life, he did nothing to prepare for death. I do mean nothing.
Yes, he wrote a Will, but he made it difficult to find. It is the one thing I asked of him, 'can you please tell me where your Will is?' He was frustrated and he got up off his chair, pulled out a drawer, and said, 'there it is', pointing to what I thought was the envelope in a vertical position.
Just before he died, I got that out, but as we now know, that was not the latest Will. It didn't matter in the end, same instructions, and I sorted it. My point is that he showed me nothing at any point. He didn't get out a file, and say, 'there's a loan with the XYZ Bank', this is what you do.' He didn't give me any instructions or suggestions about anything.
Maybe even more importantly, although that lack of instruction from a person who had assumed total control was hardly easy, was that he wouldn't have a conversation with me about how he wanted to live out his life, a bucket list so to speak, nor did he want to have a conversation around any sort of parting, a goodbye of sorts.
I understand about denial, and he was in a great deal of denial, but I have found it hard to understand how two people who spent nearly every day of the last almost 50 years together, couldn't get to a point where they had the sort of intimacy where they could talk about the meaning of life, about death, about leaving the world and those loved ones left behind, about plans and hopes and arrangements. I am an entirely different person. It's the first thing I did after the funeral - go to a lawyer and write a new Will and accompanying arrangements. Then, I set about getting us back on an even financial keel.
At the end of the day, I wanted at some point to talk to someone who just listened and listened and ultimately said something like, 'You are hurt and I understand you are hurt. It will take some healing, and I want you to take your time on this. There is much to do, and you will be very busy for a while as you sort through it all, but you are not alone. We will get through this together. There will be better days. I will see you next week. Take care.' Would that have been so hard to say?